2972. Count the Number of Incremovable Subarrays II
Description
You are given a 0-indexed array of positive integers nums
.
A subarray of nums
is called incremovable if nums
becomes strictly increasing on removing the subarray. For example, the subarray [3, 4]
is an incremovable subarray of [5, 3, 4, 6, 7]
because removing this subarray changes the array [5, 3, 4, 6, 7]
to [5, 6, 7]
which is strictly increasing.
Return the total number of incremovable subarrays of nums
.
Note that an empty array is considered strictly increasing.
A subarray is a contiguous non-empty sequence of elements within an array.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4] Output: 10 Explanation: The 10 incremovable subarrays are: [1], [2], [3], [4], [1,2], [2,3], [3,4], [1,2,3], [2,3,4], and [1,2,3,4], because on removing any one of these subarrays nums becomes strictly increasing. Note that you cannot select an empty subarray.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [6,5,7,8] Output: 7 Explanation: The 7 incremovable subarrays are: [5], [6], [5,7], [6,5], [5,7,8], [6,5,7] and [6,5,7,8]. It can be shown that there are only 7 incremovable subarrays in nums.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [8,7,6,6] Output: 3 Explanation: The 3 incremovable subarrays are: [8,7,6], [7,6,6], and [8,7,6,6]. Note that [8,7] is not an incremovable subarray because after removing [8,7] nums becomes [6,6], which is sorted in ascending order but not strictly increasing.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 105
1 <= nums[i] <= 109
Solutions
Solution 1: Two Pointers
According to the problem description, after removing a subarray, the remaining elements are strictly increasing. Therefore, there are several situations:
- The remaining elements only include the prefix of the array $nums$ (which can be empty);
- The remaining elements only include the suffix of the array $nums$;
- The remaining elements include both the prefix and the suffix of the array $nums$.
The second and third situations can be combined into one, that is, the remaining elements include the suffix of the array $nums$. So there are two situations in total:
- The remaining elements only include the prefix of the array $nums$ (which can be empty);
- The remaining elements include the suffix of the array $nums$.
First, consider the first situation, that is, the remaining elements only include the prefix of the array $nums$. We can use a pointer $i$ to point to the last element of the longest increasing prefix of the array $nums$, that is, $nums[0] \lt nums[1] \lt \cdots \lt nums[i]$, then the number of remaining elements is $n - i - 1$, where $n$ is the length of the array $nums$. Therefore, for this situation, to make the remaining elements strictly increasing, we can choose to remove the following subarrays:
- $nums[i+1,…,n-1]$;
- $nums[i,…,n-1]$;
- $nums[i-1,…,n-1]$;
- $nums[i-2,…,n-1]$;
- $\cdots$;
- $nums[0,…,n-1]$.
There are $i + 2$ situations in total, so for this situation, the number of removed increasing subarrays is $i + 2$.
Next, consider the second situation, that is, the remaining elements include the suffix of the array $nums$. We can use a pointer $j$ to point to the first element of the increasing suffix of the array $nums$. We enumerate $j$ as the first element of the increasing suffix in the range $[n - 1,…,1]$. Each time, we need to move the pointer $i$ to make $nums[i] \lt nums[j]$, then the number of removed increasing subarrays increases by $i + 2$. When $nums[j - 1] \ge nums[j]$, we stop enumerating because the suffix is not strictly increasing at this time.
The time complexity is $O(n)$, where $n$ is the length of the array $nums$. The space complexity is $O(1)$.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|